On September 2, 2025, a U.S. military operation targeted a vessel suspected of drug trafficking in the Caribbean. The first strike reportedly killed nine people and split the boat in half — causing it to capsize and sending a thick plume of smoke into the air. Surveillance video later shown to lawmakers revealed two survivors clinging to a floating, overturned portion of the boat. KTVZ+2The Guardian+2
According to testimony by Frank M. Bradley — then head of the joint command overseeing the strike, Joint Special Operations Command (JSOC) — the two survivors did not have a functioning radio or any other communication device to call for help or backup. KTVZ+1
For approximately 41 minutes, Bradley and the U.S. command center monitored the survivors as they attempted to right the capsized boat. During that time, commanders debated what to do next. Newsweek+1 Ultimately, Bradley ordered a second strike on the remaining wreckage — resulting in the death of the two survivors — reasoning that the floating portion of the vessel still contained narcotics and posed a risk of continued drug trafficking. KTVZ+2الجزيرة نت+2
The decision has sparked sharp controversy. Critics argue that targeting incapacitated survivors — unarmed and without means to escape — violates principles of international humanitarian law. The Guardian+1 Meanwhile, some defenders of the action assert that survivors clinging to a drug-laden boat still represented a threat, potentially able to complete or facilitate narcotics smuggling. KTVZ+1
The hearing before U.S. lawmakers has exposed deep divisions. Some representatives called the footage “one of the most troubling things” they have seen, while others described the survivors as legitimate targets. Yahoo+2CNN Transcripts+2
As the debate unfolds, the case raises pressing questions about the boundaries of military force in counter‑drug operations, the criteria for legitimate targets, and the ethical and legal obligations toward shipwrecked survivors.
.jpg)
0 Comments